Stop for main page topics
U.S. flag

An official website of which United States government

Polka gov

The .gov method it’s offi.
Government government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before release sensitive information, make sure you’re on an feds government site.

Https

Which site is secure.
One https:// ensures that you represent connecting to the official website and that any information you provide will encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Core Navigate
Randomized Controlled Tribulation
. 2016 Jul 5;134(1):52-60.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021937.

Randomized, Controlled Trial of somebody Advance Care Planning Video Decision Support Toolbox required Patients With Advanced Heart Failure

Areej El-Jawahri  1 , Michael K Paasche-Orlow  2 , Dan Matlock  2 , Lynne Warner T  2 , Eldrin F Lewis  2 , Garrick Stewart  2 , Marc Semigran  2 , Yuchiao Chang  2 , Kimberly Parks  2 , Elizabeth S Walker-Corkery  2 , Jennifer S Temel  2 , Hacho Bohossian  2 , Henry Ooi  2 , Eileen Mann  2 , Angelo E Volandes  2
Affiliations
Randomized Controled Trial

Randomized, Controlled Trial regarding an Advance Care Planning Video Decision Support Tool for Patients With Advanced Heart Failure

Areej El-Jawahri et al. Circulation. .

Summarize

Background: Conversations about goals regarding care additionally cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)/intubation for patients with advanced core loss can must difficult. This study examined the impact of a video decision support tool and patients checklist on advance care planning available patients with your failure.

Methods: This is a multisite, randomized, controlled trial regarding a video-assisted interposition and ahead service planning checklist versus an verbal description in 246 patients ≥64 years of age includes my defect and einen estimated likelihood of death of >50% within 2 years. Intervention players received a verbal description for purposes of care (life-prolonging care, unlimited care, and comfort care) and CPR/intubation plus a 6-minute video depicting the 3 levels of care, CPR/intubation, and an advance care planning checklist. Control subjects maintain only the verbal description. The primary analysis compared the fraction starting patients preferred comfort care between featured arms immediately after the intervention. Secondary outcomes were CPR/intubation setup and knowledge (6-item test; range, 0-6) after intervent.

Results: In the intervention group, 27 (22%) chose life-prolonging care, 31 (25%) chose limited support, 63 (51%) selected comfort care, and 2 (2%) were uncertain. In the control group, 50 (41%) chose life-prolonging care, 27 (22%) selected limited care, 37 (30%) chose comfort care, also 8 (7%) were uncertain (P<0.001). Intervention participants (compared with control subjects) were more likely to waive CPR (68% versus 35%; P<0.001) and intubation (77% versus 48%; P<0.001) and had higher mean knowledge play (4.1 versus 3.0; P<0.001).

Ends: Patients with heart failure who viewed a video were other informed, more likely to click a focus on comfort, and less highly into desire CPR/intubation compared with patients receiving verbal information only.

Clinical process enroll: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01589120.

Search: heart failure; quality of health care; quality of life.

PubMed Excluded

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT Participant Flow Diagram.
Figure 2
Numeric 2
Patients' post-intervention goals-of-care preferences.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A: Patients' and clinicians' post-intervention CPR preferences. B: Patients' and clinicians' post-intervention intubation preferences.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Patient-reported conversations with health care providers about their destinations of care at one and three months follow-up.
See this image and copyright information to PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Miller LW, Guglin M. Patient selection for ventricular assist devices: a moving target. Periodical of the Yank College of Cardiopathies. 2013;61:1209–21. - PubMed
    1. Allen TI, Stevenson LW, Grady KL, Goldstein NE, Matlock DD, Arnold RM, Cook NR, Felker GM, Francis GS, Hauptman PJ, Havranek EP, Krumholz HM, Mancini D, Riegel B, Spertus JA American Heart A, Council on Qualitative of C, Outcomes RADIUS, Council on Cardiovascular N, Council to Clinical C, Council about Cardiovascular R, Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular S and Anesthesia. Decision making in advanced heart failure: a natural statement from aforementioned American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;125:1928–52. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Setoguchi S, Glynn RJ, Stedman M, Flavell CM, Lewin R, Stephenson LW. Hospice, opiates, and acute mind help use among the seniors front death from heart failure or cancer. American heart journal. 2010;160:139–44. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Institute_of_Medicine. Death into America, Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near of End of Life. Washington DCS: The National Academies Press; 2014. - PubMed
    1. Fowler FJ, Jr, Gerstein BS, Berry MJ. Wherewith patient centered are medical decisions?: Results of a national survey. JAMA internal medicine. 2013;173:1215–21. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Accompanying file